Each alleged contact should be analyzed separately
An Oregon stalking claim generally requires repeated unwanted contact that intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly alarms or coerces the petitioner, creates objectively reasonable alarm or coercion, and causes reasonable apprehension for personal safety. Speech-based contacts can raise added constitutional requirements.
A useful chronology lists each contact with its date, location, method, exact words or conduct, witnesses, and supporting exhibit. Original messages and recordings should be preserved. The temporary order, service record, hearing notice, and any related criminal or family case also belong in the hearing file. Oregon courts publish a current stalking protective-order packet (opens in a new tab).